< Reveal sidebar

Homeland Security Withdraws Proposal for Compulsory Facial Recognition at Airports for U.S. Citizens

U.S. Customs and Border Protection screens thousands of travelers per day entering the United States. (Photo: AirlineGeeks

The use of biometric information such as fingerprints and facial recognition in the airline industry has become more familiar to passengers around the world over recent years. In addition to such procedures as biometric boarding,, the ‘capturing’ of biometric information on passports and visa applications is becoming commonplace and touted as a more efficient way to process arriving passengers through border control systems.

At some terminals at London’s Heathrow Airport, electronic gates have been available for passengers over 12 years of age who are citizens of the U.K. and the European Economic Area. From May of this year, passport holders from Australia, Canada, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland and the U.S. have also been allowed to voluntarily use the service eliminating the need to fill out a U.K. arrival card. The e-gates use facial recognition to match biometric data in the passenger’s passport allowing faster access through immigration procedures.

While this means of speeding up arrival formalities for passengers has been embraced in some countries, a plan by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to expand the current process of screening foreign nationals arriving into some American airports to mandate that U.S. citizens also comply was met with resistance. Though American citizens can currently opt-out, The Washington Post reported this week that the expansion of the process to mandate U.S. citizens comply with facial scanning when they arrive and depart the country would be challenged.

A rule listed on the site of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, titled ‘Collection of Biometric Data From U.S. Citizens Upon Entry To and Departure From the United States’, states: “The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is required by statute to develop and implement a biometric entry-exit data system. To facilitate the implementation of a seamless biometric entry-exit system that uses facial recognition and to help prevent persons attempting to fraudulently use U.S. travel documents and identify criminals and known or suspected terrorists, DHS is proposing to amend the regulations to provide that all travelers, including U.S. citizens, may be required to be photographed upon entry and/or departure.”

Though the proposal had yet to be officially published, that was scheduled for July, after which it would have been subject to a public comment period there was immediate opposition. Senators Edward J. Markey and Mike Lee who have had concerns for a number of years with how the DHS is using facial recognition technology again voiced their opposition to DHS proposals. Senator Markey has called for ‘enforceable rules protecting travelers’ privacy’ and issued a statement on Tuesday condemning the proposal.

“The Department of Homeland Security should immediately withdraw plans to force Americans to undergo facial recognition and hand over their biometric information,” said Senator Markey. “This proposal would amount to disturbing government coercion, and as the recent data breach at Customs and Border Protection shows, Homeland Security cannot be trusted to keep our information safe and secure. I will soon introduce legislation to ensure that innocent American citizens are never forced to hand over their facial recognition information.”

The breach that Markey refers to related to the theft of over 100.000 traveler and vehicle images from a subcontractor of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection. On Thursday the DHS withdrew the resolution to expand biometric screening of U.S. citizens citing discussions with Congress and privacy experts.

NOTE: This article has been updated to reflect the Department of Homeland Security’s decision on Thursday to withdraw the proposal to expand facial recognition scanning for U.S. citizens.

John Flett


  • John Flett

    John has always had a passion for aviation and through a career with Air New Zealand has gained a strong understanding of aviation operations and the strategic nature of the industry. During his career with the airline, John held multiple leadership roles and was involved in projects such as the introduction of both the 777-200 and -300 type aircraft and the development of the IFE for the 777-300. He was also part of a small team who created and published the internal communications magazines for Air New Zealand’s pilots, cabin crew and ground staff balancing a mix of corporate and social content. John is educated to postgraduate level achieving a masters degree with Distinction in Airline and Airport Management. John has held the positions of course director of an undergraduate commercial pilot training programme at a leading London university. In addition he is contracted as an external instructor for IATA (International Air Transport Association) and has been a member of the Heathrow Community Fund’s ‘Communities for Tomorrow’ panel.

    View all posts

Subscribe to AirlineGeeks' Daily Check-In

Receive a daily dose of the airline industry's top stories along with market insights right in your inbox.

Related Stories

‘Dutch Roll’ Incident Prompts FAA/NTSB Investigation

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) are investigating yet another alarming incident in which a…

Emirates Takes Off with Sustainable Aviation Fuel in Singapore

Emirates has begun using sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) in its operations at Singapore Changi Airport, marking a significant step towards…

Bleak Outlook for Bonza: Shut Down of Collapsed Airline Highly Likely

It is looking increasingly likely that Australia’s budget airline, Bonza, will be shut down. The collapsed airline’s administrators have terminated…