Relatives of Jeju Air Crash Victims Sue Boeing

The complaint alleges outdated electrical and hydraulic systems contributed to the disaster.

A Jeju Air Boeing 737 aircraft. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | Ben Suskind)
A Jeju Air Boeing 737 aircraft. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | Ben Suskind)
Gemini Sparkle

Key Takeaways:

  • Relatives of passengers killed in the Jeju Air Flight 2216 crash are suing Boeing, alleging that "outdated flight systems" contributed to the accident.
  • The lawsuits claim Boeing's 737-800 had unmodernized electrical and hydraulic systems that compromised the landing gear, leading to the December 2024 belly landing and runway overrun.
  • Complaints also highlight the aircraft's alleged lack of a Ram Air Turbine (RAT) for emergency power and the need for manual Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) activation, increasing its vulnerability to events like bird strikes.
  • The crash, which followed a suspected bird strike, resulted in 179 fatalities after the landing gear failed to deploy, causing the aircraft to overran the runway.
See a mistake? Contact us.

Relatives of passengers killed in the Jeju Air crash in South Korea late last year are suing Boeing, arguing that outdated flight systems contributed to the accident.

Aviation law firm Herrmann Law Group said Wednesday that it filed a complaint against Boeing in King County Superior Court in Seattle on behalf of 14 families who lost loved ones in the accident, which occurred at Muan International Airport.

The aircraft involved in the crash was a Boeing 737-800.

The lawsuit blames Boeing for failing to modernize “outdated” electrical and hydraulic systems, which ultimately compromised the accident flight’s landing gear.

“Rather than admitting its fault in this tragic accident, Boeing resorts to its old, worn out ‘blame the pilots’ tactic,” said Charles Herrmann, lead attorney for the plaintiffs, in a statement. “These pilots make easy targets; they perished in the flames with the passengers. They cannot defend themselves.”

“Bereaved families deserve the truth,” he added. “Met with evasion in Korea, these plaintiffs seek justice in U.S. courts where we can legally compel them to reveal the truth.”

The cause of the crash of Jeju Air Flight 2216 is still under investigation, but South Korean officials have suggested that a bird strike disabled one of its engines as it approached Muan International Airport on Dec. 29, 2024. The 737’s landing gear did not deploy, and the aircraft belly-landed beyond the normal touchdown zone. It overran the runway, crashed into a lighting structure, and then hit a concrete-encased berm supporting an antenna array.

All 175 passengers were killed, along with four of the six crew members. The two survivors were rescued from the rear of the aircraft.

According to the lawsuit, the 737’s backup power systems did not switch on after the bird strike, leaving a number of other systems, most critically the landing gear and reverse thrusters, disabled. Nearly every system designed to slow the aircraft, both in the air and on the ground, failed, attorneys for the plaintiffs said.

Zach Vasile

Zach Vasile is a writer and editor covering news in all aspects of commercial aviation. He has reported for and contributed to the Manchester Journal Inquirer, the Hartford Business Journal, the Charlotte Observer, and the Washington Examiner, with his area of focus being the intersection of business and government policy.
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Uh-oh! It looks like you're using an ad blocker.

Our website relies on ads to provide free content and sustain our operations. By turning off your ad blocker, you help support us and ensure we can continue offering valuable content without any cost to you.

We truly appreciate your understanding and support. Thank you for considering disabling your ad blocker for this website