A Cathay Dragon Airbus A330 taxies (Photo: Cathay Pacific)
Hong-Kong based Cathay Pacific has unveiled that Dragonair will soon be rebranded as Cathay Dragon, leading into “a new era of opportunity and growth.” The rebranding of the low-cost subsidy is aimed at capitalizing on Cathay Pacific’s high international brand recognition.
The rebranding is made up of a new logo incorporating the famous brushing logo which Cathay Pacific already uses, as well as a redesigned livery to closely match that of its partner. Changing Dragonair’s logo and livery will allow the two airlines to show more clearly their partnership. The original Dragonair logo, that currently is on all of its aircraft, will still be part of the fleet livery, being housed just behind the cockpit windows.
Cathay Pacific’s Chief Executive Ivan Chu said, “We are very proud of what we have achieved together. Cathay Dragon is a brand that will be recognizably part of the Cathay Pacific Group for our customers from different parts of the world. The rebranding will enable us to capture the fast-growing passenger flows across the two carriers by creating a more seamless travel experience.”
Cathay Dragon (Photo provided by Cathay Pacific)
“We are building on what is a true Hong Kong success story that has made our city a leading international aviation hub and gateway to and from Mainland China markets. This rebranding will sharpen our competitive edge by offering an attractive Cathay- led brand package that carries the assurance of a consistently high-quality customer experience.”
Dragonair was founded in 1985, starting its operations out of Kai Tak International Airport with a Boeing 737-200 and becoming the first local competitor to Cathay Pacific. Over 30 years, the Hong Kong flag carrier fought hard against the upcoming airline and attempted several times to block the airline’s flight-slot applications for airport operations. This eventually led to a decision by the Hong Kong Air Transport Licensing Authority and the Hong Kong Government to adopt a one route-one airline policy, which lasted until 2001.
Cathay Dragon (Photo provided by Cathay Pacific)
In 2006, Dragonair became a wholly owned subsidiary of Cathay Pacific. Since then it has added over 20 destinations and has witnessed passenger numbers traveling across both airlines up around 7 million in 2015, five times more than before the merger. Both Cathay and Dragonair carried 34 million in 2015, up from 22 million the previous year.
Dragonair currently has 42 aircraft in service including Airbus A320, A321, and A330 aircraft with 8 more on order. Each aircraft are fitted with a new cabin interior and have a personal television in all cabin classes.
According to the Cathay Pacific website, the rebrand will roll out over the coming months, with the new livery to appear for the first time on a Cathay Dragon A330-300 in April. The Cathay Pacific Group is planning on launching a major international advertising and marketing campaign later this year promoting Cathay Dragon and the benefits this rebranding will bring to passengers.
Receive a daily dose of the airline industry's top stories along with market insights right in your inbox.
Former employees of now-shuttered Silver Airways have received only part of their final paychecks. In a message to workers obtained…
At least one passenger survived the crash of an Air India flight on Thursday that killed over 200 people, CNN…
Delta is ending its partnership with Hawaiian Airlines as Hawaiian continues its integration with oneworld member Alaska Airlines. On its…
Different article, different author, same flawed reporting 🙁
– Cathay Dragon is not a “low-cost subsidy” (sic)
– The rebranding has a dual goal of educating the non-China market about Dragonair and the China market about Cathay (the latter being where Dragonair is the premium brand)
– “Over 40 years”? The airline is 31 years old. At least you got the year of incorporation right.
We appreciate your critique and concerns regarding this story. We have followed up with you via email.
Hi Ryan. You may wish to speak to Matthew Garcia about his article “Cathay Dragon Approved for United States Service” as history is repeating. Whilst I sympathise that it’s a common assumption among the ignorant flying public to assume multiple brands within the one group will follow premium/low cost brand differentiation, it’s not acceptable for a site positioning itself as an aviation journalist to do so.