“Uncontained Engine Failure:” The Aftermath

Photo (left): Jeremy Martin Photo (right): Greg Linton

The pictures revealed from Southwest flight 3472 were shocking and went around the internet within a few hours’ time. Speculations rolled in along with them, varying from “the engine has blown up,” to “it must be poor maintenance,”and “the crew must have not done their walk around properly.”

But what exactly happened here? As the image reveals, some of the inlet came loose and got torn off. Usually in case of structural damage like this the cause is either one of two issues: it got struck with a foreign object (bird, stones, etc.) and the impact was heavy enough to tear it apart, or there was internal discrepancy (loose parts, worn or aged materials, or instability) that by force of the airflow might have come loose or caused vibration that harmed the engine.

One thing the pictures do show is that only part of the inlet got torn off. For maintenance purposes the inlet can be removed in one piece, taking the green back-end with it to reveal the complete engine. Why, or how this didn’t happen in this case is something only further investigation would be able to conclude, which is the job of the NTSB.

The National Transportation Safety Board is unique, in that it’s not affiliated with the Department of Transport or any organization affiliated, so it can provide unbiased and factual information. It conducts research pertaining to structures, systems, and power plants, but also takes into account operations, human performance, and the weather. They investigate about 2,000 aviation accidents and incidents a year.

Turbofan engine failures are rare, only one occurs approximately every 20,000 flight hours, and the vast majority are with very low risks. For the type of engine on flight 3472, the CFM56-7B24, this rate is even lower with only one shut down incident per 333,333 hours.

Unfortunately its safety record hasn’t always been this high. In the past, there have been incidents with the CFM56 engine that required it to be redesigned. The old version, the CFM56-3C, had trouble with fan blade failures, where fatigue stress had been an underestimated factor. The entire fleet using those engines was grounded, and the blades of over 1,800 engines had to be replaced.

Even though the failure required immediate response by the Southwest crew, descent to a lower altitude, and diversion to another airport, nobody was harmed. Crews are well trained to deal with engine failures at very high standards, they are still very unpredictable and require the highest level of flight crew performance, communication, and cooperation.

AirlineGeeks.com Staff

AirlineGeeks.com Staff

AirlineGeeks.com began in February, 2013 as a one-man (er… teenager, rather) show. Since then, we’ve grown to have 20 active team members, and yes, we’re still growing. Some of us are looking to work in the aviation industry as professionals when we grow older. Some of us are still trying to decide what we want to do. That’s okay though, because we’re all here for the same reason: we love the airlines. We’re the youngest team of airline industry journalists out there.
AirlineGeeks.com Staff