A PIA A320 aircraft (Photo: Aasif Azaan / CC BY-SA (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0))
After three years of suspending the services, Pakistan International Airlines is expected to resume services to the U.K. in the coming three months according to Khawaja Saad Rafique, the aviation minister.
In addition, the airline is paving the way to resume flights to Europe after European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) passed PIA’s remote audit. EASA’s staff will go to Pakistan in September to conduct a physical audit of the airline and the country’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). However, there is no sign of lifting the restrictions from the U.S. FAA thus far. PIA ceased flight operations to the U.S. in 2017.
The country’s flag carrier was banned from flying to the U.K., the European Union and the U.S. since the plane crash in 2020. The deadly accident left 97 people dead. The report of the incident unveiled 262 pilots in the country had dodged the examination and 141 PIA pilots involved in the scandal.
“God willing, the PIA flights will resume at least to the U.K. in three months, and, later, flights to Europe and America will resume.” Rafique said.
The resumption could be a shot in the arm as the U.K. and Europe contributed 37% of its revenue. Rafique said the carrier had been facing a loss of Rs70 billion ($436 million) annually due to the suspension of the flights.
Meanwhile, PIA needs to keep the current slot at London’s Heathrow Airport for the future. The airport requires the airline to use at least 70% of the time. The report has revealed the airline has leased its slot to Vietnam Airlines and Kuwait Airways. As a result of the fake license incident, the airline needs to be restructured and requires billions of dollars in investment to avoid closure.
Future of the Airline
Rafique implied that privatization could be the answer to PIA, citing that Air India had recently placed an order for acquiring 450 aircraft. PIA couldn’t compete with other neighboring rivals with the current fleet of 27 or 28 operational aircraft. According to the carrier, the airline owns a fleet of 30 aircraft, operating regional services, such as Qatar, Malaysia and the Canadian city of Toronto.
The airline is facing a loss of Rs80 billion this year. Earlier this year, the cash-strapped airline’s flight was blocked at Kuala Lumpur International Airport over a debt.
Meanwhile, the government is trying to outsource the operations of Islamabad International Airport by Aug.12. Islamabad is set to be the first airport to outsource in the country and is expected to be outsourced for 15 years. Afterward, Karachi and Lahore Airport will follow in Islamabad’s footsteps.
The government said the navigational services and runway operations will not be outsourced. CAA will continue to provide the services.
An ITA Airways Airbus A320 with the new livery at Milano Linate International Airport. (Photo: Francesco Zangari – lin_planespotting)
In a historic development for Libyan aviation, ITA Airways, the state-owned flag carrier of Italy, successfully operated the first commercial flight between Rome and Libya on July 24, 2023. Libyan interim Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibeh was on board the Airbus A320 as it departed from Leonardo da Vinci airport in Fiumicino, Italy and landed at Tripoli’s Mitigate Airport.
The resumption of commercial flights between Italy and Libya marks a significant milestone for both nations. For Libya, it signifies the end of a ten-year hiatus in air travel between the two countries, which was originally imposed due to various challenges, including political instability and security concerns. The launch of regular flights is expected to commence in the fall, bringing renewed opportunities for connectivity and cooperation.
This development comes after Italy agreed to lift a decade-long ban on Libyan civil aviation using Italian airspace last week. The move reflects a growing confidence in the safety and security measures implemented by Libyan airports, paving the way for improved air travel between the two nations. The decision to allow Libyan carriers back into Italian airspace marks a turning point for the Libyan aviation scene, which has struggled to regain momentum since Muammar Gaddafi’s downfall in 2011.
An ITA Airways Airbus A320 with the new livery at Leonardo Da Vinci International Airport. (Photo: ITA Airways)
Libyan sources have revealed that Prime Minister Dbeibeh was personally present on the inaugural flight, underscoring the significance of this milestone for Libya.
Addressing reporters upon arrival at the International Conference on Development and Migration in Rome, Prime Minister Dbeibeh expressed his enthusiasm for the restored air link between the two countries. He hailed the flight as “a step that paves the way for opening airspace with other countries,” indicating that this development could serve as a model for establishing similar air connections in the future. In light of this positive development, Prime Minister Dbeibeh also revealed plans to open an air route between Rome and Benghazi.
The resumption of flights between Italy and Libya is expected to have broader implications for the Libyan aviation industry. As travel restrictions are gradually lifted, the demand for air travel to and from Libya is likely to increase. This could lead to the expansion of routes, additional flight frequencies, and the entry of more airlines into the market, providing travelers with more choices and convenience.
Continued collaboration between Italy and Libya in this regard will be vital to ensuring the sustainable growth of the aviation sector and fostering a positive perception of Libya as a safe and attractive destination for international travelers. The inaugural flight represents a significant step forward in revitalizing Libya’s aviation industry while hoping that this milestone will serve as a catalyst for further developments, ushering in a new era of connectivity.
Victor Shalton's love for aviation can be traced to when he was 11-years-old. As a seasoned aviation writer, he takes pride in providing the best aviation coverage around the globe and is passionate about advancing his skills in the aviation space. In addition, he loves travelling, writing, arts and while his speaking engagements have taken him around the world, he is proud to call Nairobi home.
An ITA Airways Airbus A330-200 at Rome Fiumicino Airport.
(Photo: ITA Airways)
A few days ago in Fiumicino at the operational headquarters of the Italian airline ITA Airways, the airline’s Shareholders’ Meeting was held, under the chairmanship of Antonino Turicchi, to renew the Board of Directors and the Board of Statutory Auditors, whose mandate had expired.
In a statement, the airline said that its new Board of Directors has been restricted from five to three directors as per agreements between the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance and the German group Lufthansa. The German airline will have two directors of its own, one of whom with the role of CEO.
It is good to remember that, at the present date, ITA Airways is still wholly-owned by the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance. Lufthansa will buy 41% of ITA Airways for €325 million, with the option to acquire the remaining shares later, perhaps even 90-100% by 2033. It is imperative to remember that the privatization process is still contingent upon the approval of the Directorate-General for Competition of the European Union.
ITA Airways has been a SkyTeam member since its inception in October 2021. However, former CEO Lazzerini had already confirmed in May that the airline will leave the Skyteam alliance for entry into Star Alliance. a process that will take about a year.
Appointments
The new Chairman of ITA Airways is Antonino Turicchi, previously a member of the Board of Directors of Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena, Leonardo, Alitalia, Autostrade per l’Italia S.p.A., and a member of the Supervisory Board of STMicroelectronics. Since December 2019, he has been the Chief Executive Officer of Fintecna S.p.A. He is currently Chairman of Gardant SGR S.p.A., the Gardant Group’s asset management company specializing in investment solutions for institutional investors.
Valeria Vaccaro and Francesco Spada have been elected directors, while the Board of Statutory Auditors has been reconfirmed. Andrea Benassi, current Chief Network, Fleet, and Alliances Officer, will assume the position of General Manager. At the same time, Francesco Presicce, the former Chief Technology Officer, has been appointed Accountable Manager of ITA Airways.
The Board of Directors of the Italian airline also approved the termination of the employment relationship with Fabio Maria Lazzerini, its former CEO and General Manager.
ITA Airways’ New Board of Directors. (Photo: ITA Airways)
Plans and fleet
Lazzerini, last May, confirmed that the merger with Miles & More (Lufthansa’s frequent flyer program) would not take place and that Volare would remain the loyalty program of ITA Airways. However, the German group will appoint the new CEO of the Italian airline, and it has yet to be seen which changes will come along with that. Volare has over one million members, but only 40% use frequent flyer benefits.
After 2025, the German group expects another investment of around €450 million, and the Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance could retain only 10% or a representative on the board of directors. ITA Airways’ business plan envisages revenue growth of €2.5 billion in 2023 and €4.1 billion expected in 2027.
With the German group, the goal is to reach a fleet of 94 aircraft with 5,500 employees. ITA Airways’ fleet currently consists of 71 aircraft in service, with an average age of 8 and a half years.
ITA airways fleet by airframe (Data: AviationValues)
ITA airways status by airframe (Data: AviationValues)
Vincenzo graduated in 2019 in Mechanical Engineering with an aeronautical curriculum, focusing his thesis on Human Factors in aircraft maintenance. In 2022 he pursued his master's degree in Aerospace Engineering at the University of Palermo, Italy. He combines his journalistic activities with his work as a Reliability Engineer at Zetalab.
An American Airbus A321 landing in Charlotte.
(Photo: AirlineGeeks | William Derrickson)
One week after United Airlines reached an Agreement in Principle (AIP) for a new $9 billion contract with its pilots, American Airlines has updated its own proposal to match United’s offer. American’s updated proposal added over $1 billion to the contract it proposed this Spring.
American’s new contract matches the pay rates, backpay, sick time, life insurance, and other benefits offered to United pilots, per American Airlines CEO Robert Isom. American’s pilots will begin voting on the updated deal on Monday.
Captain Ed Sicher, the President of the Allied Pilots Association, the union that represents American Airlines pilots, said union leadership will weigh “whether management’s comprehensive proposal is worthy of a membership vote.”
“We’ll return to the bargaining table and do what’s necessary to get to a deal. It just won’t be done quickly,” Isom said. “We run a complex business and any changes to what we agreed to — even small ones — may have a profound impact. Reconsideration of all of these items would take time.”
Industry-Wide Pilot Contracts
American was the second legacy carrier in the United States to propose a new contract to its pilots. Across the board, airline pilots have been fighting for years to win new contracts with their companies, but the Covid-19 pandemic gave pilots extra leverage to pressure airlines for more.
Delta Air Lines pilots approved what was at the time an industry-leading deal in March. That gives unions at American, United, and other major carriers additional bargaining power they could use to set the bar for what their own contracts should have been. American proposed pilots a new contract in the spring, and pilots were set to vote on the contract over the summer.
A pilot waves from an American E190 at LaGuardia. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | William Derrickson)
However, after United’s recent contract proposal outdid American’s, company management went back to the drawing board out of fear the pilots would reject the contract by comparing it to United’s. Just after United’s agreement was announced, the Allied Pilots Association called on management to “meet the new industry standard” if it wants the contract to be approved by pilots.
By bringing its own proposal close in line to what United is offering, American makes it more likely that the proposal will be approved after all. If that happens, it will be years before the union will need to resume negotiation on what yet another contract might look like.
Pilots’ Bargaining Power
The covid-19 pandemic has given pilots tremendous power to put pressure on airlines for massively-improved contracts. Airlines from the smallest regional airlines up to the biggest airlines in the country have seen pay hikes over the past year.
However, what bargaining power will look like when contracts are up next is still to be seen. Over the next few years, the aviation industry will continue to not only recover from the pandemic but surge forward. United, in its own right, has added a significant number of long-haul flights in 2023, and the company has not shown any signs of slowing its expansions down.
An American Boeing 777-200 in Dallas/Fort Worth. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | William Derrickson)
If such expansions continue, not only at United but at all other airlines, pilots will likely continue to have significant power in determining new contracts. How airline management will respond to continued pressure from pilots has yet to be seen, and the relative power pilots have next time to make another significant jump in compensation might not be as great assuming there is not another catastrophe to upend the industry and put pilots and airlines under pressure.
The big three US airlines each, in some form or another, rank as the world’s biggest airline. The Allied Pilots Union represents 15,000 pilots at American Airlines alone. Thus, they have tremendous power to set larger trends around the world in how other airlines pay flight and cabin crew. We have seen with these waves of pilot contracts that the actions of any one of the big three and their pilots have significant implications for the other two and other major airlines in the United States and around the world.
John McDermott is a commercial pilot pursuing a career in professional flight. His passion for aviation began in an Ann Arbor bookstore with a tale of enemy pilots during World War 2, and he hasn't looked back. Besides flying and writing for AirlineGeeks, John volunteers with Professional Pilots of Tomorrow and travels whenever he gets the chance.
An Alaska Airlines E-175 operated by Horizon Air at Paine Field. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | Katie Zera)
Seattle-based Alaska Airlines had announced plans to resume its popular, yet short, route between Redmond and Portland, both located in Oregon. The route spans 116 miles and is a much faster alternative to the nearly three-hour drive between the cities.
The once-daily service between the cities will resume on Nov. 29, 2023 on board the carrier’s 76-seat Embraer E175s. The service is currently only scheduled to be operated seasonally ending on April 10, 2024, but it could be extended if the route performs well.
A Horizon Air Embraer E175 operating for Alaska Airlines. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | Katie Bailey)
Alaska last operated the flights in November of 2021 using the Q400 and ended the service due to “insufficient passenger demand due to covid.” Alaska Airlines’ Q400 aircraft, which has since been retired from the airline’s fleet, does have the same number of seat as the E175, but it didn’t offer a first or premium cabin like the jet aircraft, and it was obviously much slower since it was a turboprop aircraft.
While Alaska Airlines stopped the route in 2021, other airlines have since then. Notably, San Francisco-based Boutique Air briefly served the route between the two cities, but they used a private FBO in Portland, so passengers needed to go through security a second time in Portland if they connected on to another airline. Boutique operated the route from Oct. of 2020 to July 2021 on a once-to-twice-daily basis depending on the day, and then again sporadically operated the route in November and December of 2022. They used a much smaller, the 8-seat Pilatus PC12.
A Boutique Air Pilatus PC-12 in Greenville, Miss. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | Joey Gerardi)
This will be the fifth route Alaska Airlines flies from Redmond. They already operate flights to San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Seattle-Tacoma.
All flights and information presented in this article are subject to change.
Joey has always been interested in planes for as long as he can remember. He grew up in Central New York during the early 2000s when US Airways Express turboprops ruled the skies. Being from a non-aviation family made it harder for him to be around planes and would only spend about three hours a month at the airport. He was so excited when he could drive by himself, the first thing he did with his driver's license was get ice cream and go plane spotting for the entire day. He graduated from Western Michigan University in 2022 with a B.S. in Aviation Management & Operations and a Minor in Business, and currently works for a major airline in his hometown.
An Air India Boeing 787-8. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | William Derrickson)
Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport, India’s busiest airport, has reached a significant milestone with the inauguration of a fourth operational runway, RWY 11L/29R, and a state-of-the-art dual elevated taxiway, Eastern Cross Taxiway (ECT). These new facilities were inaugurated on Jul 14, 2023, by Mr. Jyotiraditya Scindia, the Union Civil Aviation Minister of India, and are set to revolutionize the airport’s capacity and efficiency.
Enhanced Capacity with RWY 11L/29R
The newly constructed RWY 11L/29R, a remarkable feat by Larsen and Toubro (L&T), becomes Delhi Airport’s fourth runway. Running parallel to RWY 11R/29L, this 4.4-kilometer-long and 45-meter-wide runway is equipped with CAT III-B / CAT II technology. The addition of RWY 11L/29R is expected to increase the airport’s daily flight capacity from 1,500 to an impressive 2,000 movements. This boost will effectively cater to the ever-growing demand for air travel within the Indian aviation industry.
With sustainability in mind, the airport aims to reduce its carbon footprint significantly. IndiGo operated a validation flight to carry out checks and inspect the runway before it could be put into service. Soon after, an Air India Airbus A320neo to Jammu, India, was the first scheduled flight to take off from the runway on Jul 14, 2023. For the time being, the runway will handle only departures until RWY 10/28 undergoes recarpeting and repairs, after which RWY 11L/29R will be fully operational for both arrivals and departures.
Efficient Connectivity with Eastern Cross Taxiway (ECT)
Accompanying the new runway, the Eastern Cross Taxiway (ECT) is a revolutionary dual-elevated taxiway positioned above the IGI T3 Access Road. Spanning 2.1 kilometers in length and 202 meters in width, the ECT is Code F compliant, allowing seamless navigation for widebody aircraft like Airbus A380 and Boeing 747.
This innovation significantly reduces taxi time between the northern and southern airfields on the airport’s eastern side. The ECT not only streamlines airfield movements but also brings substantial environmental benefits. Reducing the distance from RWY 29R to Terminals 1 and 2 from 9 kilometers to a mere 2 kilometers, the ECT helps save approximately 350 kilograms of fuel and reduces carbon emissions by up to 1,114 kilograms per aircraft. These efforts align with the airport’s vision to achieve Net Zero Carbon Emissions within the next seven years.
Future Development Projects
Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL) is proactively driving several developmental projects to accommodate the burgeoning demand for air travel in India. Among these initiatives, Terminal 1 is undergoing a significant expansion, expected to be completed by the end of 2023. With more than three times its current area, Terminal 1 will serve as an integrated facility for arrivals and departures, doubling its capacity from 20 million to 40 million passengers annually.
Additionally, the airport is actively adopting digital solutions, such as facial recognition and e-boarding passes, to ensure a faster and more convenient passenger experience while moving towards a paperless environment.
It all started at the age of five when Vihaan got a Qantas 747 model from Sydney Airport. Since then, he has been an AvGeek, collecting aircraft models, safety cards, and even magazines! He has flown over 120 flights to more than 25 countries worldwide.
Vihaan shares his passion for photography and aviation by spotting at New Delhi's Indira Gandhi International Airport and wherever flights take him. Apart from being an AvGeek, Vihaan is currently an undergraduate business management student and aims to pursue a career in aviation consulting and analysis. You can check out some of his spotting work at @aviation.del on Instagram.
Ryanair Commits to Post-War Ukrainian Investment
Ryanair is gearing up to serve a war-stricken nation.
A Ryanair 737 at Paine Field.
(Photo: AirlineGeeks | Katie Bailey)
Ryanair Group CEO Michael O’Leary was in Kyiv, Ukraine this week to outline Ryanair’s strategy to assist the country to recover once the war is over and airspace in the region is reopened for commercial aircraft.
“Ryanair was Ukraine’s 2nd largest airline before the unlawful Russian invasion in Feb 2022,” said Mr. O’Leary. “Once the skies over Ukraine have reopened for commercial aviation, Ryanair will charge back into Ukraine linking the main Ukraine airports with over 20 EU (European Union) capitals, and we are working closely with the Ukrainian Government to rebuild Ukraine’s aviation, industry and its economy.”
The commitment given by Ryanair is that operations to and from the main airports of Kyiv, Lviv and Odesa will commence within eight weeks of the reopening of airspace. Though the conflict is still ongoing, Mr. O’Leary outlined the airline’s plan post-war is “to invest heavily in Ukraine and lead this aviation recovery by investing up to $3 billion and basing up to 30 new Boeing MAX aircraft at Ukraine’s 3 main airports in Kyiv, Lviv and Odesa.”
Growing Capacity
The level of capacity detailed by the airline will see 600 weekly flights operating from the 3 main airports both domestically and internationally. This will amount to over five million seats in the first 12 months of post-war operation rising to 10 million per annum over a five-year period. Prior to the conflict Ryanair also operated from Ukraine’s Kharkiv and Kherson airports and Mr. O’Leary stated that “Ryanair will return to serving those airports too, as soon as the infrastructure has been restored.”
Deputy Prime Minister for Restoration of Ukraine and Minister for Infrastructure, Oleksandr Kubrakov met with Mr. O’Leary and members of the airline’s senior management team. Mr. Kubrakov outlined the importance of the Ryanair Group’s commitment to the post-war strategy of Ukraine. “Maintaining the operability of the aviation infrastructure and personnel vocational skills remains vital for us in the conditions of war. Meanwhile, the resumption of flights will be possible as soon as the security situation allows. However, we are already working on solutions and investment plans to enable aircraft to fly up quickly. I am grateful for the leadership in the recovery of our aviation industry, for the specific proposals and decisions of Ryanair, a loyal partner of Ukraine.”
Together the group toured Kyiv’s Boryspil International Airport in what the airport’s CEO Oleksiy Dubrevskyy called “a powerful signal that the largest airline in Europe sees huge potential in the Ukrainian air transport market.”
Mr. Dubrevskyy added: “We, meanwhile, are ready to move from strategic planning to specific operational actions when the airspace becomes open and safe for civil aviation. I strongly believe that Boryspil Airport will remain the main air gate for the return of our citizens to Ukraine and will continue to play a leading role in the recovery of the Ukrainian economy.”
John has always had a passion for aviation and through a career with Air New Zealand has gained a strong understanding of aviation operations and the strategic nature of the industry. During his career with the airline, John held multiple leadership roles and was involved in projects such as the introduction of both the 777-200 and -300 type aircraft and the development of the IFE for the 777-300. He was also part of a small team who created and published the internal communications magazines for Air New Zealand’s pilots, cabin crew and ground staff balancing a mix of corporate and social content.
John is educated to postgraduate level achieving a masters degree with Distinction in Airline and Airport Management. John has held the positions of course director of an undergraduate commercial pilot training programme at a leading London university. In addition he is contracted as an external instructor for IATA (International Air Transport Association) and has been a member of the Heathrow Community Fund’s ‘Communities for Tomorrow’ panel.
U.S. House of Representatives Rejects Additional Flights To Reagan National
An American Eagle E175 taxis at Reagan National with a "monumental" backdrop. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | Ryan Ewing)
This past Wednesday, the United States House of Representatives voted down a new provision to allow an increase in the number of flights operated into and out of the closest airport to the Nation’s Capital, Washington Reagan National Airport. The legislation would have allowed carriers to operate more routes, aimed explicitly toward Western destinations. However, the rejection of the provision seeks to have more travelers use one of the Capital’s outlying airports, Washington Dulles International Airport.
The legislation would have allowed carriers to operate 14 additional flights from the slot-controlled Reagan Airport. The move would have benefitted Delta, which has a fairly large operation out of Reagan, but a small footprint at Dulles compared to United.
Currently, routes out of Reagan are limited to 1,250 miles. There are exceptions to this requirement, such as Alaska Airlines’ route from Seattle. However, the specific slots that Delta has been lobbying for are those that extend outside of the restriction perimeter.
Compared to April 2022, Delta saw an increase in passenger demand of 17.9% this past April, higher than both American and United. This increase in passenger travel for Delta competes directly with United’s Dulles operation. Reagan National is just four miles from Downtown, while Dulles is 30 miles outside of the city center. This makes Reagan significantly more convenient to those who are downtown.
Air traffic statistics published by Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority showed Reagan handling 200,000 more passengers than Dulles this past April, and almost one million more from the start of the year to that time. This reinforces the fact that Reagan is the airport of choice for D.C. locals.
Dulles Airport
While an increase in slots would benefit Delta, it would hamper United’s operation over at Dulles. The carrier worked with lawmakers to oppose the ruling, arguing that the airport wouldn’t be able to handle an increase in flights.
The additional argument to be made is that Reagan doesn’t have plans to grow additionally in the near future, as there really is not much space to work with. Dulles on the other hand, was designed with expansion in mind. Reagan has a current land area of just under 900 acres, while Dulles takes up 13,000 acres. The footprints alone at both airports foreshadow the increase in movements at Dulles in the future as the airport will be able to handle additional future traffic.
While The House did vote to reject, the bill continues on the legislative process onto the Senate and then the President, before it is fully terminated or enacted.
Zach’s love for aviation began when he was in elementary school with a flight sim and model planes. This passion for being in the air only intensified throughout high school when he earned his Private Pilot Certificate. He then attended Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, earning his certificates and ratings to later flight instruct and share his passion for aviation with others. He now resides in the North East living out his dream as an airline pilot.
Trip Report: Finding a Better Connection to Europe Through Aer Lingus
An Aer Lingus Airbus A330 awaits departure from Dublin.
(Photo: AirlineGeeks | John McDermott)
Iceland has become famous over the past few years for serving as a connection point between North America and Europe. The travel model — championed by WOW Air before its bankruptcy and continued by Play and Icelandair — sees passengers flying between major North American and European cities with a stop in Keflavík.
Thousands of passengers have used this method of travel since WOW Air started advertising Keflavík as a stopover point; passengers could either connect straight through Iceland or spend a few days in the country before moving on, saving money and getting an extra adventure as an added bonus.
There is another country, though, that could serve a similar purpose: Ireland. Similarly to Iceland, Ireland’s location is geographically beneficial for connections from North America to Europe. Located on the far Western edge of the European continent, the country’s capital, Dublin, makes for a fairly-direct connecting point for passengers going onward to Europe.
Though Ireland doesn’t have the same low-cost offering that Iceland does in the United States, its flag carrier, Aer Lingus, is similar to Icelandair, the full-service carrier that serves Iceland. On a recent trip from Chicago to Munich, I had originally looked to book through Iceland; Icelandair serves Chicago twice daily, making it a convenient connection. However, I soon found that Aer Lingus’ prices were cheaper than Icelandair’s, and I could get more amenities, such as free seat selection and a checked bag, for about the same cost that Icelandair would charge.
Booking My Flight
Thus, I decided to book Aer Lingus for my trip to Germany. The booking and check-in processes were fairly straightforward and are similar to any other flag carrier operation you’d find in Europe or the United States.
There are two things to note about the booking and checkin process. First, I noticed there was no place to list my American Known Traveler Number (KTN), which gives me automatic access to TSA PreCheck on departure from the United States and Global Entry upon my return.
Though for a moment I figured the area was just hidden somewhere – after all, it took me a try or two to find the KTN area when I first booked on Lufthansa – I learned a few days before my flight that Aer Lingus does not participate in the PreCheck program. Thus, I knew going into the flight that I’d be relegated to the standard security area on departure.
However, there was also a plus to the checkin program. This does not directly apply to me, but I feel it’s a nice touch: the airline offers a wide array of accommodations for travelers with allergies or disabilities as well as neurodivergent passengers. Besides being able to request an allergen-free or vegan meal, I noticed that there was also an option to request mobility assistance and even notify the crew that a traveler is autistic.
The flight crew could then accommodate these issues and either help a passenger onboard or, through a partnership with the Kinney Center for Autism Education and Support, assist with the sensory issues that could be cause by loud engines, changing lighting levels, or other sensory inputs that come from the normal operation of an aircraft; the airline has a special page on its website to help guide autistic passengers through each step of the onboard experience as well as the departure and arrival airport phases.
My Airport Experience in Chicago
My trip would consist of two legs. The first, a flight from Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport to Dublin International Airport, would be served by an Airbus A330-300. After an hour or so in Dublin, I would connect onto an Airbus A321neo that would fly me the rest of the way to Munich.
My flight to Dublin, flight EI 122, was scheduled to leave O’Hare’s Terminal 5, the international terminal used for departures by most foreign airlines, at 15:50. I arrived at the airport just after noon to check in for my flight. I had arrived at the airport just a few minutes after checkin had opened at the airport – early enough that the airport boards didn’t even list that checkin was open – so I made my way to the ticket counter and got in line.
The checkin process was easy. Though a fairly-substantial line had started forming, the airline staff was moving efficiently. Checkin included a passport check. The agent issued me boarding passes for both of my flights and checked my bag as well. After a short discussion about a pin from my alma mater that the checkin agent was wearing – Northwestern University chartered a flight to Dublin last summer to play a football game in Ireland – I took my boarding passes back and headed towards security.
For my first trip without PreCheck in about a year, the security process was straightforward. I used the central security checkpoint in Terminal 5. Though the line was substantial, the process was fairly painless; like the checkin workers, the TSA workers were moving efficiently, so, especially with all the extra time I had, there was no need to worry.
Exploring O’Hare’s Terminal 5
After clearing security, it was time to wait for my flight. I was dismayed to find that my gate did not have a view of the Airbus A330 that would fly us to Ireland, so I would not see the outside of the aircraft until many hours later on arrival into Dublin. I spent the bulk of my time exploring Terminal 5, including checking out the new Delta wing; Delta is one of a few domestic airlines that uses Terminal 5 and has by far the largest presence of any airline in Terminal 5, and it was my first chance to experience their facilities there firsthand since they moved from Terminal 2 last winter.
I also got to check out the new expansion for the first time. I worked at O’Hare for months while the expansion was being built, but this was my first time experiencing it as a passenger and not an employee. A few of the hardstands at the far end of the terminal I had once marshaled (relatively) tiny Pilatus PC-12s into now housed gates with Southwest 737s and United 787 Dreamliners preparing for passenger flights, quite the shift from the small turboprops, cargo flights (on passenger planes), and maintenance aircraft I had often seen there.
Boarding in Chicago
One thing I had been confused about was the section on my boarding pass that told us when the “gate closed.” This time was nearly an hour before the scheduled time of departure. I wondered if that meant that boarding would be completed by then and the gate closed, so that nobody else could board. Thus, I returned from my terminal exploration back to the gate especially early out of an abundance of caution.
My fears of missing my flight were unfounded. The gate closing time ended up being when the boarding process began. Before I knew it, a large crowd had gathered at the gate area in preparation for departure.
One of the biggest things I’ve noticed about transatlantic flights on European carriers that the boarding process is usually quite disorganized. Neither Lufthansa, which I’ve flown to Germany a couple times, nor Aer Lingus use boarding groups or dedicated lines. After letting preboarders and passengers in business class board, Aer Lingus simply started boarding back to front, calling sets of rows at a time and waiting for passengers to make their way through the crowd to board the aircraft.
As I had selected a seat in the next-to-last row, I was one of the first economy class passengers to board, a nice perk that I wasn’t expecting. As I made my way onto the aircraft, the first thing I noticed was how brightly green the interior was. The cabin design looked and felt decades old; whether it was that old I’m not sure, but the aircraft would show a bit of age throughout the flight, an issue I’ll get back to shortly.
I found my way to the back of the cabin to find my seat…and the metal box preventing me from fitting my backpack completely under the seat in front of me. This isn’t an issue I can really blame Aer Lingus for; I think it’s more an unfortunate product of how the A330 is built.
After really trying to push and squeeze my aging backpack into whatever space was left below the seat, I ended up fitting my backpack into the smallest overhead compartment I’ve ever seen. I was sure to pull my laptop and a book, both of which I stored in the seatback pouch in front of me, out of my backpack before departure.
During boarding, the crew made special note of two issues we’d encounter in flight today. First, they noted that the Wi-Fi onboard the aircraft wasn’t working. Per Aer Lingus’ website, it seems that Wi-Fi is standard on Aer Lingus’ Airbus A330s, so its dysfunction today must have been non-standard. Second, in keeping with the dated cabin features, we were warned that the In-Flight Entertainment screens might freeze in flight, but that we could page the cabin crew to fix the screens should they malfunction as well.
I was glad, therefore, that I had work and entertainment that did not rely on Wi-Fi to function. It was especially important, though, to pull everything I needed from my backpack before closing the overhead bin so I wouldn’t keep stepping over the passenger next to me to get into the aisle.
I found a pillow, a blanket, and earbuds waiting for me at my seat. This seems to be standard economy-class care on transatlantic services. The blanket and pillow were far from luxurious, but this is also standard-fare across airlines and isn’t something especially lacking about Aer Lingus. Though I didn’t use the blanket or earbuds, the pillow ended up coming in useful for back support throughout the flight.
Our Flight to Dublin
After getting settled, all I had to do was wait for departure. Our flight pushed back from the gate exactly on time; however, after push, we didn’t start taxi for 10-15 minutes. As with the room under the seat ahead of me, I expect this was not Aer Lingus’ fault but rather an operational delay relating to the airport or the air traffic control system. I couldn’t find the ATC audio of the pushback, so I don’t know exactly why we were delayed, but soon we were moving towards the northern airfield for departure.
Our takeoff and climbout were normal. Soon after departure, I tried testing the in-flight entertainment as part of the video trip report I was filming; as predicted, though, the screen froze within a few minutes of use. I decided not to page the cabin crew to have the screen unfrozen, but I did notice that the screen was quite outdated. Unlike the United 737 MAX 9 I had been on a couple weeks earlier, whose IFE screen was a standalone touchscreen unit, the system on this aircraft used a remote as its primary control. It took me a few minutes to get used to the controls, learn how to get what I wanted, and adjust to just how much effort it took to get the screen to do what I wanted. Since the screen froze, though, this ended up being a non-issue.
An hour or so into the flight, the cabin crew came by with a standard assortment of drinks, all free. I chose a water to boost my hydration at the start of my journey. Dinner was served within another hour. There was a chicken option, a beef stew, and a vegetarian option, but by the time the crew reached my row in the back, only the beef stew remained; the flight attendant joked that this was unusual, as people often tend to prefer the beef stew and leave the other options for the last few rows.
The stew came with a roll, a small salad, triple chocolate mousse, and a cup of water. I enjoyed the meal and would be happy to have it again. I’d even go so far as to say that this was one of my favorite onboard meals I’ve had lately. I certainly enjoyed eating it.
After dinner, the cabin crew dimmed the lights to let people sleep. We would never have a true night on this trip. It was daylight for the first half of the flight before the sun began to set over the western Atlantic ocean. The moment the sun had set on the way out, it was rising again as we approached Ireland; I wish I had captured a video of the sunset blending right into a sunrise as we approached Europe.
The flight attendants came through a few times throughout the flight offering coffee and tea, but I did not take any drinks after the very first service after departure. It was still nice to know that the option was available multiple times throughout the flight should I have wanted some.
The half-sunset/half-sunrise while we approached Dublin. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | John McDermott)
I spent most of the rest of the flight editing the clips I had for my video trip report so far, and I managed to sleep for a couple hours. An hour or so before landing, the crew came by with the pre-arrival snack, a warmed sandwich with ham, egg, and cheese. This was definitely the best pre-arrival snack I’ve had in a while, even beating out the cold sandwiches I’ve had on Lufthansa over the past year. Aer Lingus’ sandwich was tasty, and the warmth was a welcome addition.
I also managed to ask the cabin crew about what the customs situation would be. When I visit Munich, I usually fly straight into Germany and either terminate in Munich or hop a domestic flight from Frankfurt; thus, I simply go through customs when I land from my first flight. I wasn’t sure if I’d go through customs in Ireland and officially enter the European Union or wait until arriving in Germany. The crew was polite, helpful, and knowledgeable (I’d clear customs in Germany), and the answer helped me feel more prepared for my connection.
Connection in Ireland
Our flight landed in Dublin just after 05:00 a.m., about 30 minutes early. When we taxied in and disembarked, I finally got my first look at the aircraft that had flown us safely across the pond. The plane wore Aer Lingus’ new white-based livery, as opposed to the green that the company is known for.
I couldn’t spend too much time admiring, though, as I had about an hour to find my connecting flight on to Germany. While I rushed around the terminal, I realized I’d need to join an incredibly-long line to make my connection. I might have accidentally cut in front of a bunch of people because I didn’t immediately recognize the line as that for connecting passengers…but I was certainly glad that I had an hour to make my connection, as other passengers around me had 10 or 20 minutes before their next flight left.
The line, though long, turned out to move pretty quickly; I was through in no more than five or ten minutes. The line was also considerably shorter than when I started; my guess is that, since a couple international flights had just arrived from the United States, the line was longer than normal since multiple widebodies had just dumped passengers into the same place.
Each passenger needed to scan their connecting boarding pass to be let into the main airport area. Afterwards, each passenger was asked if they were connecting to a flight within Ireland or to another country. Those connecting to other Irish destinations were pointed towards passport control, while I was sent toward a side exit that lead to connections for other destinations.
I ended up having enough time to explore the mostly-empty terminal. A few flights were going out, but it wasn’t even 6 am, so while some gates had empty planes waiting for passengers, many others were completely empty. Only a few flights were active at the time, so the airport was also relatively quiet, with not too many announcements.
Onward to Munich
I would continue on to Munich on flight EI352, an Airbus A321neo. It was my first time on an A321neo; I’ve been on other A320 family planes before, though. Aer Lingus flies two round trip connections from Dublin to Munich daily. Lufthansa also competes on this route, with two A320/A321 flights per day.
An interesting caveat: Aer Lingus also flies the Airbus A321 to a few cities in the United States. Most notably, the carrier just launched flights to Cleveland, Ohio on narrowbody Airbus aircraft. I have family in Cleveland, so maybe one day I’ll consider starting my trip there to fly two narrowbodies to get from the midwest to Munich and see what the narrowbodies-across-oceans hype is all about.
In Dublin, I decided not to get breakfast (not much was open that early in the morning anyways), and, after a bathroom break, I simply waited for my onward flight to Munich. The wait wasn’t long – we started boarding less than an hour after I arrived in the new terminal – and boarding soon began again. I was toward the back of the plane again, and I had priority boarding because, though I didn’t bring one, I had carry-on privileges on this flight. I did find it interesting that Aer Lingus only let me bring carry-ons on my flights between Dublin and Munich – I have the same perk on my return flight later this month – but not on either transatlantic flight.
I wonder if passengers often buy duty-free goods in Dublin and want to carry them on to their final destination, though I’m not sure how I’d consolidate an extra carry-on bag into my backpack in Dublin before heading back home. Either Aer Lingus has found a genius method of getting people to pay for an extra carry-on at the gate before hopping the pond or people find other means of getting rid of a carry-on (eating all the snacks they bought?) before boarding to go back home.
Upon boarding, the A321’s cabin instantly struck me as fresher and more modern than the A330’s cabin had been. The A321neo is surely a newer addition to Aer Lingus’ fleet than the A330, so maybe the airline installed a new cabin on this plane when it was delivered new but didn’t manage to upgrade my A330 yet.
I found my way to the back of the aircraft for my seat. Just as the cabin generally felt fresher upon boarding, my seat also felt more modern and up-to-date than my A330 seat. The IFE screen instantly reminded me of my aforementioned United Airlines MAX 9 screen, so I had high hopes to test it out in flight.
Our flight from Dublin ended up being significantly delayed. Though boarding was efficient, it took extra time to get enough fuel and pack all the checked bags onboard the plane. After pushback, we also spent a while sitting on taxiways waiting to join the long conga line for departure. Since we missed our departure slot, I wonder if other aircraft were prioritized for takeoff until we could fit into another opening in the airspace system.
Suddenly, though, we were moving, and we cut in front of a long line of Ryanair and fellow Aer Lingus planes holding on an auxiliary runway for departure. After a 30 minute departure delay, we got a beautiful view of Dublin Airport as we made a 180° turn towards the European mainland and Germany.
This flight was fairly uneventful. At 2 hours long, it was just long enough to enjoy and to demand a substantial form of entertainment (my book) but not long enough to warrant a proper service. Drinks and snacks were available only for purchase, reminiscent of a low-cost airline instead of a full-service flag carrier. I didn’t buy anything since I refilled my water bottle in Dublin.
The in-flight entertainment system worked perfectly on this flight. The system was fully touchscreen, so no awkward remotes to navigate or random freezes to derail your favorite movie. There were many different types of entertainment to choose from (movies, TV shows, podcasts, games, films about Aer Lingus’ history, and more), but the selection of titles within each category was varied. Though I scrolled the titles, I didn’t spend much time actually watching anything.
Despite our late departure from Dublin, we arrived in Munich exactly on time. The airport experience in Munich was standard. There was no line at passport control, so I got through in a few minutes. My checked bag was delivered within a reasonable amount of time.
Final Thoughts
Overall, I enjoyed my trip with Aer Lingus. Though there were occasional hiccups (the awkwardly-managed space below the seat in front of me, the Wi-Fi and IFE breakdown from Chicago to Dublin, and the delay leaving Ireland), most of these issues weren’t Aer Lingus’ fault, and the airline mitigated the issues that were in its control well. Both flight crews, especially on the transatlantic flight, were helpful and pleasant and made my flights enjoyable. The meal on the transatlantic flight was the best I’ve had on a flight lately, and the cabin environment from Dublin to Munich was state-of-the-art. We had entrancing cabin lighting and great views of a sunset and a sunrise en route to Dublin as a boost.
I believe Aer Lingus is a great option for connections from North America to Europe. I will definitely consider them again when I take my next trip. Additionally, I definitely want to try one of their narrowbody transatlantic flights as well to compare with the experience I had on this trip. I think that the combination of the A321 cabin with the long-haul service would make for an excellent experience.
Many thanks to Aer Lingus and my flight crews for getting our flights safely to their destinations, and to do so on time as well. I look forward to my next flights.
John McDermott is a commercial pilot pursuing a career in professional flight. His passion for aviation began in an Ann Arbor bookstore with a tale of enemy pilots during World War 2, and he hasn't looked back. Besides flying and writing for AirlineGeeks, John volunteers with Professional Pilots of Tomorrow and travels whenever he gets the chance.
A Cathay Pacific Cargo 747-8F in Sydney (Photo: AirlineGeeks | Hisham Qadri)
Cathay Pacific has announced that it will ramp up its services to Australia by adding 58,240 seats to Perth, the airport reports. The carrier has recently revealed that its long-haul routes are especially popular for student traffic, such as to places like Australasia, the U.K. and North America since the pandemic.
The city’s flag carrier will operate five times a week to Perth, the gateway to Western Australia, starting Dec. 6. The airline will use an Airbus A350-900, which can carry 280 passengers with Business, Premium Economy and Economy Class. The extra flights are expected to meet the travel boom during the holiday season.
“Cathay Pacific has excellent connections throughout North Asia including mainland China, South Korea and Japan, as well as options through to the USA and Canada offering Western Australians access to a range of travel destinations,” Kate Holsgrove, Perth Airport’s Acting CEO, said.
Cathay Pacific currently operates 84 flights to and from Hong Kong and Australia, with six flights per week between Hong Kong and Perth.
Returning to Profitability
Cathay Pacific announced that it had carried over 1.5 million passengers last month with 87.7% load factor, expecting the outlook of July and August will be encouraging as it continues to scale up the flights meet the travel demand.
“We are very encouraged to see that our journey of rebuilding Cathay is on the right track. We have seen a trend of continuous improvement in the performance of our airlines and our financial position is healthy.” Ronald Lam, Chief Executive Officer of the airline, said.
The airline has finally seen a silver lining after keeping its head above water during the pandemic, expecting a consolidated profit of approximately HKD4 – 4.5 billion ($511 – $576 million) for the first half of 2023.
IATA even forecasts Hong Kong could turn the tables and reach pre-pandemic levels by the end of 2024, sooner than it expected. Cathay Pacific was left behind due to travel restrictions and losing HKD33.7 billion over three years, the most challenging period in Cathay Pacific’s history.
Meanwhile, Cathay Pacific is determined to enhance its services to Chinese passengers, announcing plans to hire 200 to 300 flight attendants in China. The new staff need to speak fluent Putonghua. It came after a discrimination incident, when three flight attendants were sacked after being accused of discriminating against non-English passengers.
The traffic figure has been improving since Hong Kong reopened its border in last September. According to Hong Kong International Airport, it currently handles about 120,000 passengers a day, about 60% of the pre-pandemic levels.
In addition, the airport hasn’t stopped expanding its facility during the pandemic. The third runway began operating last July, and the expansion of Terminal 2 is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2024. The airport could handle 102 million passengers by 2035 after the expansion.