Stories

American Seeks Tokyo Haneda Slots to Start JFK Service

American briefly operated a flight between JFK and Tokyo Haneda between February 2011 and December 2013.

An American 777-200 in London (Photo: AirlineGeeks | William Derrickson)

In an application filed with the United States Department of Transportation (DOT), American Airlines has requested the seven weekly slot pairs that will soon be vacated by Delta at Tokyo Haneda Airport. American is requesting the slots to restart service between Haneda and New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK).

American’s Haneda Slot Request

American is proposing to start a daily service between New York and Tokyo Haneda. In its application to the DOT for the slots, the Fort Worth-based carrier stated that it “has firm plans to commence daily year-round nonstop roundtrip service between New York City’s John F. Kennedy International Airport and Haneda with these seven weekly slot pairs using widebody aircraft.”

The proposed service would connect two major global cities and would add to the four existing daily flights between the two airports. Both Japan Airlines and All Nippon Airways currently fly two daily flights between Haneda and JFK using Boeing 777-300ER aircraft. Japan Airlines and American are Oneworld alliance partners and American currently codeshares on Japan Airlines’ flights between JFK and Haneda.

American briefly operated a flight between JFK and Tokyo Haneda between February 2011 and December 2013, but ended the service, citing unprofitability due to late arrival and early departure slot times. The airline also previously flew from JFK to Tokyo’s other major airport – Narita International Airport – until it ended that route in favor of its Haneda service in 2012.

The Battle for Haneda Slots

After the opening of Narita Airport in 1978, Haneda became primarily used for domestic flights. In 2010, the airport opened a new international terminal and expanded its international offerings. The roster of international flights at Haneda has continued to grow, as it is the preferred airport for many travelers and airlines due to its close proximity to central Tokyo.

However, capacity at Haneda is limited and the demand for slots is high. Following the expansion of the U.S.–Japan Air Transport Agreement in 2019, the DOT was in a position to grant an additional 12 weekly slot pairs between Haneda and the United States, bringing the total number of U.S. slots to 17. After a public interest review, the DOT awarded these slots to four airlines: American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Hawaiian Airlines and United Airlines.

Delta received the greatest number of slots at five. The slots were granted to each airline to serve specific U.S. airports and one of Delta’s awarded pairs was for a route between Portland International Airport and Haneda. While the airlines were to lose a slot should they not use it, the DOT put a waiver on this condition during the COVID-19 pandemic. This waiver is coming to an end this month and Delta still has not started its Portland–Haneda route. For months, Delta asked the DOT to allow it to shift the slot to another U.S. airport, citing changing market conditions.

The DOT was unconvinced by Delta’s arguments, stating that the slot awarding process should be restarted instead: “The department believes, consistent with our past practice, that should any of the carriers selected for Haneda service wish to change their U.S. gateway, the public interest would be best served by our consideration of such a request on the basis of a fresh and complete evidentiary record, and in light of the circumstances presented at that time.”

In September, Delta indicated that it would not be starting service between Portland and Haneda, thereby freeing up the slot pair that American is now requesting. United has also applied for these slots to operate flights from Houston’s George Bush Intercontinental Airport and Haneda. United has separately asked for some of Hawaiian’s unused frequencies to start a Guam–Haneda service.

Andrew Chen

Andrew is a lifelong lover of aviation and travel. He has flown all over the world and is fascinated by the workings of the air travel industry. As a private pilot and glider pilot who has worked with airlines, airports and other industry stakeholders, he is always excited to share his passion for aviation with others. In addition to being a writer, he also hosts Flying Smarter, an educational travel podcast that explores the complex world of air travel to help listeners become better-informed and savvier travelers.

Avelo Airlines Increases Pilot Compensation

Avelo is also set to open a new pilot and flight attendant training center in Orlando, Fla., at the beginning of 2024.

Avelo Boeing 737
An Avelo Airlines Boeing 737-700 at Tweed-New Haven. (Photo: Avelo Airlines)

Avelo Airlines announced on Tuesday that it is increasing compensation for its pilots for the fifth time since the company launched in April 2021.

According to the airline, its first-year hourly pay rate for captains starts at $240 and first officers at $131. The pay rate is capped at 12 years, coming to $298 per hour for captains and $201 per hour for first officers. Avelo reports that it also offers a 125 percent pay incentive when pilots fly 75 hours or more.

“The pay increase we are announcing, combined with the other exceptional benefits and quality of life Avelo offers, will continue to make Avelo a very attractive destination for pilots,” said Avelo Airlines chairman and CEO Andrew Levy. “Our pilots play a critical role in Avelo’s future, and we look forward to welcoming many more of these outstanding aviation professionals to our airline in the months and years ahead.”

Headquartered in Houston, Avelo operates a fleet of 16 Boeing 737-700s and -800s with plans to add at least five additional aircraft next year. Its pilot roster stands at nearly 170 employees. The airline stated that it is accepting applications for direct-entry captains and first officers.

“At Avelo Airlines, pilots hire pilots,” said Avelo COO Greg Baden. “This is an exciting opportunity for both direct-entry captains and young professional aviators to get in on the ground floor of an incredible journey as they continue their careers.”

Avelo is also set to open a new pilot and flight attendant training center in Orlando, Fla., at the beginning of 2024.

Editor’s Note: This story originally appeared on FlyingMag.com. 

AirlineGeeks.com Staff

AirlineGeeks.com was founded in February 2013 as a one-person blog in Washington D.C. Since then, we’ve grown to have 25+ active team members scattered across the globe. We are all here for the same reason: we love deep-diving into the fascinating realm of the airline industry.

Boeing Opens New Engineering and Techonology Center in Brazil

Boeing opens new Engineering and Technology Center in Brazil as part of its new global engineering strategic moves.

Boeing's Everett facility
Boeing's Everett, Wash. factory in 2019. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | Fangzhong Guo)

On Tuesday, Boeing announced the opening of its Engineering and Technology Center in Brazil, one of 15 Boeing engineering sites worldwide that develop advanced technology to drive aerospace innovation. Based in São José dos Campos (SP), where the company began operations in 2014, the engineering center is an expansion of Boeing’s strategic investments in Brazil, employing about 500 engineers supporting current and future programs.

“Boeing’s longstanding partnership with Brazil dates back more than 90 years, and during that time, we have collaborated with the Brazilian aerospace industry and community to tap into the incredible technical abilities and problem-solving skills of Brazilian engineers,” said Lynne Hopper, vice president of Boeing Engineering, Strategy and Operations.

“Their expertise strengthens our commitment to engineering excellence and positions us to tackle the next generation of challenges in our industry,” Hooper.

Settling Lawsuits?

The move comes more than three years after the company ended the $4.2 billion deal to buy Embraer’s commercial branch. In addition, the regional jet manufacturer was also among a group that sought to stop the aerospace giant from poaching local talents in court.

A Boeing 737 MAX 10 on a test flight.
(Photo: AirlineGeeks | Katie Zera)

Abimde (Brazilian Association of Defense Materials Industry) and AIAB (Association of Aerospace Industries of Brazil) sued in November 2022 to interrupt the hiring in draconian terms. It’s unclear if Boeing’s Memorandum of Understanding for Technological Cooperation with the state of São Paulo includes any concession regarding the lawsuit filed in the state’s 3rd Federal Court of São José dos Campos.

Boeing’s Talent Problem

The new engineering center is part of the Arlington, Va.-based company’s initiative to ditch Russia, where it used to hire as many as 1,500 engineers. The company had to shutter its operations in Russia weeks after the country started invading Ukraine. The US company relocated about 100 engineers from its Moscow engineering center to countries in the Middle East and East Europe. However, the interruption still left a dent in its engineering resources.

Although not very directly impacting Boeing, the recent conflict in Israel will undoubtedly impact the company’s ability on some of its engineering projects due to its relationship with companies such as Israel Aerospace Industries. The Middle Eastern company supplies the 787’s passenger & cargo floor grids, door surrounds, and the pivot bulkhead. In the past, Boeing has also inducted many engineers from its supplier’s cargo conversion division to its own. 

A Boeing 737 MAX 9 testbed aircraft.
(Photo: AirlineGeeks | William Derrickson)

Boeing is also facing more challenges at its home base in the Seattle area. It lost more than 500 of its senior engineers due to pension changes in 2022. It has also lost its engineering talents to tech companies for many years. A slew of new space and aerospace start-ups are also fighting fiercely for engineers in the area. For instance, Amazon’s Blue Origin has grown from 850 employees to more than 3,000 in the Seattle area in 2022. In the last two years, both MagniX and ZeroAvia, leaders in electric and hydrogen aircraft propulsion, opened offices down the street from Boeing. 

The challenges have forced Boeing to fill the holes elsewhere. However, it’s concerning how much more fragmented the Aerospace’s giant operations will become and how that will affect its effectiveness as a product design organization.

Fangzhong Guo

Fangzhong grew up near an OEM airport in northeastern China, where he developed his enthusiasm for aviation. Taking upon his passion, he's now working as an aircraft interior design engineer. Besides working in the aerospace industry, Fangzhong enjoys trying out different types of airplanes and seeing how airplane interiors have evolved. So far, he's flown on over 80 types of aircraft. He also planespots in his spare time. His rarest catches included the 747 Shuttle Carrier Aircraft and AN-225.

Israel’s El Al Poised to Maintain Vital Air Link

As other airline's cut flights to Israel, El Al has spent well over $100 million preparing itself for threats and maintaining a link.

El Al Boeing 777-200
An El Al 777-200 in London. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | William Derrickson)

El Al is no stranger to thwarting threats across its fleet of 41 aircraft and 55 different stations worldwide. For nearly two decades, the now privately funded airline has spent over $1 million per aircraft installing various missile defense systems while enhancing security protocols that span well beyond its Tel Aviv hub.

Operations at Ben Gurion International Airport in Tel Aviv continue to be disrupted after a deadly attack by Islamic militant group Hamas. Airlines worldwide, including U.S. carriers, have scrubbed flights to Israel. Atlanta-based Delta Air Lines announced Monday that it would cut all of its Tel Aviv flights through the end of October.

“Citizens of Israel, we are at war. Not an operation, not a round [of fighting,] at war! This morning Hamas initiated a murderous surprise attack against the state of Israel and its citizens,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Saturday during an address.

On average, nearly a quarter of flights to/from Israel have been canceled since attacks broke out on October 7, per data from FlightAware. Since Saturday, approximately 45% of flights in the country experienced delays. Aviation regulators have admonished pilots flying in or around Israel with the FAA advising ‘caution.’

Preserving an Air Bridge

Bucking the trend of precautionary service cancellations, El Al is operating a near-normal schedule. Between Saturday and Sunday, El Al had 77 scheduled flights departing Israel, and canceled only a single frequency. The carrier had 80 flights arriving in Israel, with only one canceled, according to FlightAware data.

“Our flights are operated as scheduled,” El Al’s website reads.

Not only is the carrier preserving its regular schedule, but it is also adding additional flights to bring soldiers to its home country. In an unprecedented move, Israel called for 300,000 reservists on Monday, per Reuters.

Of course, maintaining some level of passenger service is one lifeline for a war-ravaged country, but what about cargo? While El Al no longer operates a dedicated freighter, the airline sells cargo capacity across its fleet of passenger jets. In July, El Al’s Tel Aviv home airport reported 14,387 tons of cargo transported in passenger aircraft.

An El Al Dreamliner in Everett, Wash (Photo: AirlineGeeks | Katie Bailey)

Out of the roughly 6,700 international flights into Israel scheduled for October 2023, El Al operates 22% of them, per data from Cirium.

‘Do Not Fly’ Airspace

Amid the flurry of reports that Hamas is targeting Ben Gurion airport with rocket fire, the nearby airspace remains bustling. Pleadings from other regulators have not slowed down traffic, and the Civil Aviation Authority of Israel says it is “mitigating the risk to an acceptable level of safety,” per a FlightGlobal report.

OpsGroup – a group of industry operations professionals who monitor global airspace conditions – issued a stark warning on Monday. Citing recent air disasters involving attacks on airliners, including MH17 and UIA752, the group cautions that a similar event could happen in Israel.

“Israel is now an active war zone, and therefore the Safe Airspace warning is at Level 1 – Do Not Fly. The Israeli cabinet officially declared war against Hamas on Sunday, Oct 8th,” a post from the group read. “The risk of a passenger aircraft becoming a casualty of this war is high.”

Shared on Monday, OpsGroup’s post does note that a significant amount of operating flights are El Al’s, which may still be repatriating citizens and conducting troop transport.

An El Al 737-800 aircraft (Photo: AirlineGeeks | William Derrickson)

“This may give operators even a sense that ops are normal – but bear in mind that these El Al flights are to some degree troop transport movements, and in fact may increase the appetite for making civil aircraft a target,” the post concludes.

Even though El Al has capped fares and added frequencies, it is unclear how many of its flights are solely operating to transport troops. Despite these warnings, a handful of other air carriers continue to fly a near-regular schedule to Israel. Arkia, Israir, and Pegasys Airlines reportedly had no cancellations over the weekend.

Keeping Business As Usual?

Airlines perform regular risk assessments to balance safety and efficiency. In fact, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) recommends that operators conduct a ‘robust risk assessment’ when deciding whether to fly to Israel.

Keeping an airline flying with rocket fire in its home base’s backyard is indeed a risky play, but El Al comes prepared.

A 2002 terrorist incident where a shoulder-fired missile narrowly missed an Israeli Boeing 757 prompted El Al to install a system called Flight Guard on its fleet. “When a plane comes under attack, the system responds by firing flares designed to confuse a heat-seeking missile and divert it away from the original target,” a 2004 CNN article reads. The fully automated system included a Doppler radar with a full 360-degree view. If a missile were to be detected, flares would be deployed in seconds, a tactic commonly used on fighter jets.

A recent StackExchange post indicates that the system may have been modernized over time. Another Israeli-designed system named C-MUSIC DIRCM (direct infrared countermeasure) leverages lasers instead of flares to deter any approaching missiles. The airline reportedly began deploying the C-MUSIC system in 2013.

An El Al 737-800 with an anti-defense system installed on the bottom of the fuselage (Photo: AirlineGeeks | Fabian Behr)

El Al’s safety and security infrastructure go well beyond its fleet. A majority of the company’s pilots are ex-Air Force aviators, some of whom have combat experience. The airline – along with Israeli officials – reportedly staff each flight with an armed air marshal.

On the ground, it is not uncommon to see extensive security personnel around El Al’s aircraft, even in out-stations. While its aircraft taxi, El Al will commonly enlist local law enforcement to trail the jet until it becomes airborne. Back inside the terminal, El Al security personnel question passengers prior to check-in, and then again at the gate. Airports worldwide often must cordon off a distinct gate for flights to Israel in compliance with the country’s stringent security policies.

A 2003 analysis in Bloomberg News estimated that El Al spends approximately $100 million per year to comply with Israeli security measures. The airline employs security staff and contractors at all of its stations.

Often dubbed a model for air travel security, El Al has built an airline around its security protocols. During wartime, maintaining critical connections is important for moving both people and supplies. Defense programs such as the U.S.’s Civil Reserve Air Fleet (CRAF) seek to do just that with contracted airliners.

Investing millions of dollars and decades readying itself for wartime, El Al appears steadfast in continuing regular operations.

Ryan Ewing

Ryan founded AirlineGeeks.com in February 2013 and has spent more than a decade covering the airline business. His work has been featured by CNN, WJLA, CNET, and Business Insider. His aviation experience spans airport operations, Part 135 regulatory compliance, and airline crew workforce planning, along with time behind the yoke of a Cessna 172 and interviews with airline executives. Ryan now serves as Group President of Firecrown Media’s Aviation Group. He holds a B.S. in Air Transportation Management and an MBA from Arizona State University and teaches Airline Management at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.

U.K.’s Doncaster Sheffield Airport Could Resume Service

Doncaster recorded an operating loss of 4.3 million pounds and handled about 400,000 passengers in the 12 months ending in Mar. 2022

Doncaster Airport (Photo: https://www.peel.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/newdsa.jpg)

After almost one year of ceasing flight operations, U.K.’s Doncaster Sheffield Airport could revive in two years, according to Mirror.

Doncaster closed its doors last November as a result of a lack of financial viability and high fixed costs. Last year, the airport turned down the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority (SYMCA)’s financial lifeline and believed the public sector grant was not viable. The closure of the airport left the council devastated. Ironically, Doncaster was crowned as the best airport in the U.K. ahead of its closure.

EY, a consultant company, has shed light on the future profitability, expecting the airport could make a profit within five years, and deliver up to a billion pounds to the region in jobs while also increasing land value. The report has reviewed that Doncaster could attract up to two million passengers a year within a decade, more than pre-pandemic levels.

“Still a long way to go but there’s some light at the end of the tunnel,” Oliver Coppard, the mayor of South Yorkshire, said.

The City of Doncaster (CDC) has held a series of meetings with Peel Group, the airport’s landowner. CDC is willing to take on a 100-year lease on the site, but Peel hasn’t accepted the proposal thus far.

The council has gone further in preparing a Compulsory Purchase Order (CPO) to regain the site if a deal cannot be reached. The council has prepared 3.1 million pounds ($3.8 million) for legal fees, in case a CPO is required.

Determined to Relaunch Doncaster

Meanwhile, the authority has negotiated with 15 private sector firms interested in operating the future airport. The interested parties could be bidding for the contract by October 25. The new operator is expected to be chosen in March 2024. Also, the Civil Aviation Authority pushed back a decision on whether the site control airspace should be removed.

“Since the future of Doncaster Sheffield Airport was first threatened, we’ve always said we would do whatever we could to save our airport,” Coppard said.

CDC believes that the reopening of the airport could be a catalyst for economic growth and would restore international connectivity for Doncaster and South Yorkshire, which is currently the biggest city in Europe without an airport. The airport is forecast to create almost 5,000 direct jobs as well as creating up to 11,500 jobs in the wider economy.

“Saving the airport is critically important for Doncaster and South Yorkshire,” Ros Jones, the mayor of Doncaster, said.

Doncaster recorded an operating loss of 4.3 million pounds and handled about 400,000 passengers in the 12 months ending in March 2022. TUI became the sole airline at Doncaster after the withdrawal of Wizz Air from the airport last June.

South African Airways Expands Fleet, Adds New African Destination

The current fleet of South African Airways stands at a total of six active aircraft, which comprises five Airbus A320s and one A340-300.

A South African A330 taking off. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | James Dinsdale)

In line with their vision to enhance their operational capacity and routes, South African Airways (SAA) has welcomed an additional Airbus A330-300 to its fleet, the airline reports. The aircraft, registered as ZS-SXI, comes as part of SAA’s strategy to reconnect with passengers and rebuild its network.

The current fleet of South African Airways stands at a total of six active aircraft, which comprises five Airbus A320s and one A340-300. Additionally, the airline is leasing a Boeing 737-800. Two of their jets are presently undergoing maintenance, an A320 and an A330-300.

Plans are already in motion for the new Airbus A330-300, with scheduled flights set to commence. Starting from October 31, the airline intends to operate flights from Cape Town to São Paulo, and from November 6, flights will connect Johannesburg to this vital route. Both routes will be serviced by the Airbus A330-300, configured to accommodate up to 249 passengers across two classes: 46 seats in business class and 203 in economy class.

Domestic Boost: Sun Express Leases Two Boeing 737s

SAA is not just looking to expand its international footprint; it’s also committed to meeting the domestic travel demands of its passengers. The South African national airline has entered into a temporary leasing agreement with Turkish-German holiday airline Sun Express that involves two Boeing 737-800 aircraft, which SAA intends to deploy on domestic routes during the high-demand southern summer season.

The first Sun Express aircraft will be in operation from October 20 to March 31 with the second joining the fleet from November 16 to March 31. These Boeing 737s will connect major South African cities, including Johannesburg, Cape Town, and Durban, offering travelers greater flexibility and convenience. Notably, this arrangement coincides with Sun Express’ reduced jet requirements in the northern winter.

Abidjan Joins the Network

SAA’s commitment to growth extends to the African continent, with the airline announcing the launch of a new route to Abidjan in Côte d’Ivoire. This marks SAA’s 12th destination in Africa.

The Abidjan route, which will be operated via Accra, Ghana, will utilize the Airbus A330-300 aircraft. Bookings are already open for this route, with the inaugural flight set to take off on Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2023. This route will enhance connectivity between South Africa and West Africa, providing passengers with a convenient and efficient travel option.

The flight schedule will see SAA flying to Félix Houphouët Boigny International Airport in Abidjan three times a week, departing Johannesburg on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays at 11:00 a.m. with an arrival time in Abidjan at 5:00 p.m., including a brief 55-minute stopover in Accra.

What sets this route apart is SAA’s commitment to reducing travel time for passengers. Compared to other airlines serving this route, SAA aims to cut the flight duration to just 6 hours, thanks to its strategic stopover in Accra.

Moreover, this route introduces an airfreight connection between Accra, Abidjan, and Johannesburg, promoting trade links among these major cities and strengthening SAA’s global network.

Interim CEO, Professor John Lamola, reiterated that the decision to add Abidjan to SAA’s route schedule was the result of careful analysis, emphasizing the airline’s commitment to sustainability since its restart.

Victor Shalton

Victor Shalton's love for aviation can be traced to when he was 11-years-old. As a seasoned aviation writer, he takes pride in providing the best aviation coverage around the globe and is passionate about advancing his skills in the aviation space. In addition, he loves travelling, writing, arts and while his speaking engagements have taken him around the world, he is proud to call Nairobi home.

test

A KLM Cityhopper Embraer E190. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | William Derrickson)

AirlineGeeks.com Staff

AirlineGeeks.com was founded in February 2013 as a one-person blog in Washington D.C. Since then, we’ve grown to have 25+ active team members scattered across the globe. We are all here for the same reason: we love deep-diving into the fascinating realm of the airline industry.

Carriers Scuttle Flights to Israel as FAA Tells Pilots to ‘Exercise Caution’

Passengers traveling through the Tel Aviv airport were advised to be on alert to take shelter.

El Al 737-800
An EL AL 737-800 (Photo: AirlineGeeks | William Derrickson)

Flight operations at Ben Gurion International Airport (LLBG) in Tel Aviv, Israel, saw widespread cancellations and delays Monday as many major international carriers canceled service following the eruption of war after a large-scale deadly attack by Islamic militant group Hamas.

A rocket landed close to the airport Monday, according to media reports.

Travel disruptions are among the many latest developments for the country left reeling after a multifront surprise attack Saturday by more than 1,000 Hamas fighters that left an estimated more than 1,100 dead and thousands more wounded.

The airport has an average of 236 flight departures daily, according to FlightAware data. On Sunday, about 27 percent of flights into Israel had been canceled and about half were delayed.

About 37,000 air passengers travel to Israel daily, according to Cirium, an aviation analytics company.

By Monday, major carriers United Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and American Airlines all suspended service to Israel, The Associated Press reported Monday.

Not all carriers cut service, however. Israel airline El Al ramped up flights in order to bring Israeli reservists back to the country amid its unprecedented call-up of 300,000 reserve troops, Reuters reported. The airline had not canceled any flights, and many of its flights in and out of Israel were full, an El Al spokesperson told Reuters.

‘Exercise Caution’

In a Notice to Air Missions, or NOTAM, published Monday, the FAA advised all air carriers and commercial air operators planning to fly into or out of Tel Aviv to “exercise caution”

“Due to the ongoing conflict situation in the region, between Israel and Gaza-based extremist militants, operators are advised to review current security, threat information and NOTAMs,” the FAA said. “Delays are expected, [so] operators should calculate fuel accordingly.”

Passengers traveling through the Tel Aviv airport were advised to be on alert to take shelter.

“In light of the security situation in the state of Israel, Ben Gurion Airport is prepared in accordance with the orders of the Home Front Command,” airport management said in a notice to travelers. “Given the need to evacuate the terminal when there is an alarm at the airport, the following instructions must be followed: When an alarm sounds, passengers are asked to obey the instructions of security personnel in order to reach the protected areas.”

This story was originally published by Kimberly Johnson on FlyingMag.com

AirlineGeeks.com Staff

AirlineGeeks.com was founded in February 2013 as a one-person blog in Washington D.C. Since then, we’ve grown to have 25+ active team members scattered across the globe. We are all here for the same reason: we love deep-diving into the fascinating realm of the airline industry.

New England Patriots, Eastern Airlines Face Off in Lawsuit

At the time of writing, Eastern has not commented on the suit, so we do not really know why exactly it demanded more money.

A Boeing 767 owned by the New England Patriots. (Photo: New England Patriots)

Moving NFL teams is a massive logistical challenge. Teams need to move hundreds of players and staff and thousands of pounds of equipment every time they go on the road, and they often fly business class to accommodate the large size of many players.

The business of moving sports teams is so lucrative that major airlines have aircraft specially dedicated to moving the teams they’re partnered with. However, in recent years, some NFL teams have reverted to buying their own airplanes to cut the middleman and handle travel themselves.

The Patriots’ Team Jets

One of the most notable teams to do so was the New England Patriots, who in 2017, purchased two Boeing 767-300s and painted them in a unique livery featuring six Lombardi trophies. The team hired Eastern Airlines in 2020 to operate the flights, and the airline has since used the planes on cargo and charter flights during the NFL offseason to make extra money.

The contract that the Patriots signed with Eastern was for six seasons, which should have gotten them through the end of the 2026 season. However, the team alleges that Eastern violated that contract by threatening to stop operating the flights without more money. According to the New York Post, the Patriots cut ties with the airline and subsequently filed a $22.8 million lawsuit against Eastern in Manhattan court, along with a holding company that leased the planes to Eastern for the originally agreed-upon six seasons.

“If the [New England Patriots] did not pay Eastern more than provided for in the parties’ agreement, Eastern would simply walk away from the agreement, leaving the Patriots without an airplane operator on the eve of the upcoming NFL season, and with no plan in place to transport the Patriots’ sizeable contingent of players, coaches, and other personnel across the country,” the Patriots allege.

While the lawsuit is pending, the Patriots will go back to chartering American Airlines jets for the season. The iconic Patriots jets will sit idle until a resolution is reached.

Economics of Private Team Jets

Purchasing a jet is not a bad idea for sports teams that have the upfront capital to do so. Buying jets, even ones as old as the Patriots’, is not a cheap endeavor, but if a team could afford the upfront cost, they would save on operating expenses by handling many of the costs of travel themselves.

However, airplanes only make money when they’re actually flying. This is one of the great perks of working with an operator like Eastern. Not only would the Patriots not take on the additional hassle of hiring crews, worrying about currency, and paying to maintain the jet themselves, but the plane could more easily make money during the offseason by utilizing the established connections the operator already has.

Thus, the Patriots are losing out on a lot of money with their jets sitting on the ground, as they still need to pay for maintenance, to store the aircraft, and to keep the aircraft properly registered. There are also additional checks that must be completed on planes long sitting idle before they can be returned to service later on.

These effects are compounded by the fact that the Patriots own not one but two planes, apparently so they would have a backup available if one plane encountered maintenance issues at an inconvenient time. So the airline needs to maintain not one but two idling jets as they work out the lawsuit with Eastern and find a new operator.

Eastern Airlines’ Situation

Why exactly Eastern demanded more money is as of yet unclear. One must wonder, though, whether the carrier is in financial trouble and saw this demand as one of the few ways they would bring on additional capital. If that is the case, though, it didn’t work, and the lost flight time would only compound any potential financial issues the airline has.

What’s clear is that Eastern has big plans for its future. The airline is currently in the process of starting its second regularly scheduled route: flying from New York to Wuhan, China. The airline’s only scheduled route connects Miami with Santo Domingo in the Dominican Republic. Perhaps that has unexpected costs that the airline wanted to offset, or maybe they see their services in higher demand due to the plans for the scheduled route and felt they had to charge more for services that draw resources away from their new scheduled operations.

At the time of writing, Eastern has not commented on the suit, so we do not really know why exactly it demanded more money or how they plan to respond to this suit.

John McDermott

John McDermott is a commercial pilot pursuing a career in professional flight. His passion for aviation began in an Ann Arbor bookstore with a tale of enemy pilots during World War 2, and he hasn't looked back. Besides flying and writing for AirlineGeeks, John volunteers with Professional Pilots of Tomorrow and travels whenever he gets the chance.

Stuck at the Regionals: The Downside to Flow Agreements

If your end goal is a particular major airline, think long and hard about whether you want to work for any of its associated regional airlines.

A Mesa CRJ 900 in the American Eagle livery. (Photo: AirlineGeeks | William Derrickson)

I’ve been trading texts with a good friend of mine—an airline pilot we’ll call “Scott”— regarding the flying career of his 27-year-old daughter, “Karla.” Ever since she decided to start flying in her late teens, Karla has had the goal of eventually working for Scott’s airline and would ideally like to fly a trip with him before he retires in a few years.

To this end, she attended a university with a popular collegiate aviation program that has an official relationship with said airline and whose alumni are well represented in its ranks. While in school, she took a semester to do a flight operations internship with Scott’s airline. And after instructing for a few years to build her flight time, Karla was hired at her dream airline’s wholly owned regional airline, which has a flow-through agreement in place by which its r pilots advance to the mainline carrier in seniority order, albeit at a metered rate.

By all appearances, Karla would seem to have done everything right, and in normal times I think her career moves would have made sense given her goals. But the past two years have not been normal times. Karla has been at her regional airline for 13 months now and is becoming increasingly frustrated by the perception that she’s stuck there with no way to advance. She’s still a ways from upgrading to captain and will need to be in the left seat for two years before she is eligible to flow to mainline.

Meanwhile, Scott’s airline has been hiring historically huge numbers of pilots—2,500 per year—many of whom have similar qualifications to Karla. They are not, however, hiring from her regional outside of the restrictions of the flow. By going to her dream airline’s associated regional, Karla has unwittingly put herself at a huge disadvantage. Now she is watching in frustration as the mainline ranks fill up with young, ever-senior pilots. She fears the music will stop on this hiring cycle before she has a seat.

This has been a common hiring dynamic at the airlines for years before the existence of ubiquitous flow agreements: Major airlines have long been loath to sap pilots from their associated regionals and add to their staffing woes, much preferring to poach pilots from competing carriers’ regionals. During the current pilot shortage, a common workaround has been to go from a regional airline right seat to a low-cost carrier like Spirit, JetBlue, or Frontier (all of which were reduced to hiring low-time regional first officers by mid-2021), where one becomes attractive again to mainline recruiters. Scott’s airline has hired quite a few pilots from Karla’s regional by way of Spirit or Frontier, sometimes pausing there for as little as six months. However, over the summer the job market has tightened just enough for the low-cost carriers to get pickier, and they are avoiding pilots who they think will not stick around. Karla has applied to all the low-cost carriers without success. Her college, internship, father, and current regional all betray her mercenary intent.

I can sympathize with Karla’s dilemma. I too was “stuck” at the regionals after 9/11—for a full decade as it turned out. For many pilots of my generation, it’s wryly amusing to see ambitious twenty-something pilots scramble to escape the (now well-paid) regional airlines after as little as one year of employment in the sector. But to be honest, I feel that, in a perverse way, I was almost lucky to be stuck in place when I was. Yes, I was making little money without much hope of advancement, but most everyone was in the same situation. The majors were hiring precious few, so I didn’t have to worry about missing the boat, and that helped me enjoy my time at the regionals. In comparison, today’s regional pilots like Karla have every reason to worry that they are getting left behind and growing increasingly desperate to avoid that fate. It’s a little sad to see.

I’ve advised Scott that if Karla can’t attract the eye of a low-cost carrier, she should change her focus to the other two legacy major airlines. Chances are they are all too happy to poach pilots from Karla’s regional. Even though these airlines aren’t the one Karla’s been dreaming about working for all these years, they have similar fleets and contracts, her flying opportunities and earning potential will be on par, and her seniority progression might be a little better. And once she’s on property at a mainline career, Scott’s airline might come calling after all.

For those who are applying to the regional airlines, I think Karla’s case should be considered as a cautionary tale. If your end goal is a particular major airline, think long and hard about whether you want to work for any of its associated regional airlines. Be especially wary if it has a flow-through agreement in place. Flows have a time and place—and I was hired at my major airline via a flow-through. But in this hiring cycle, they are velveteen handcuffs.

This story was originally published on FLYING by Sam Weigel. 

AirlineGeeks.com Staff

AirlineGeeks.com was founded in February 2013 as a one-person blog in Washington D.C. Since then, we’ve grown to have 25+ active team members scattered across the globe. We are all here for the same reason: we love deep-diving into the fascinating realm of the airline industry.
Sign-up for newsletters & special offers!

Get the latest stories & special offers delivered directly to your inbox

SUBSCRIBE

Uh-oh! It looks like you're using an ad blocker.

Our website relies on ads to provide free content and sustain our operations. By turning off your ad blocker, you help support us and ensure we can continue offering valuable content without any cost to you.

We truly appreciate your understanding and support. Thank you for considering disabling your ad blocker for this website